MicroPython vs Arduino for ESP8266 and ESP32

Using MicroPython with Thonny instead of Arduino IDE (C/C++) for ESP8266 and ESP32 brings several practical benefits, especially for learners, rapid prototyping, and high-level development. Here’s a breakdown comparing MicroPython + Thonny vs. Arduino IDE:
________________________________________
πŸ”§ 1. Ease of Use – Especially with Thonny
βœ… MicroPython + Thonny:
β€’ Beginner-friendly IDE: Thonny is a lightweight, easy-to-use Python IDE perfect for newcomers.
β€’ Plug & play: Just install MicroPython firmware, connect board via USB, and start coding.
β€’ Built-in REPL terminal: You can run code line-by-line, see results immediately, and debug easily.
β€’ No compilation: Code runs instantly without lengthy compile-upload cycles.
❌ Arduino IDE:
β€’ Requires C/C++ knowledge.
β€’ More setup: installing board packages, managing libraries, etc.
β€’ Slower feedback loop: you must compile and upload every time you test a change.
________________________________________
⚑ 2. Faster Prototyping
βœ… MicroPython:
β€’ Write scripts like Python – dynamic, high-level, and concise.
β€’ Ideal for testing sensors, networking, and logic without restarting the board every time.
β€’ Upload multiple files (main.py, config.json, etc.) to the ESP’s internal filesystem via Thonny.
❌ Arduino:
β€’ Each change needs a full rebuild.
β€’ Single monolithic sketch file.
β€’ No persistent file system support (unless you manually use SPIFFS or LittleFS).
________________________________________
🧠 3. More Human-Friendly for Learning and Education
βœ… MicroPython + Thonny:
β€’ Great for students or makers who already know Python (common in schools and universities).
β€’ Easier syntax, less boilerplate code.
β€’ Live variable inspection in Thonny during execution.
❌ Arduino IDE:
β€’ C++ can be intimidating.
β€’ Pointers, memory management, and compile-time errors increase complexity for beginners.
________________________________________
🌐 4. Built-in Networking
βœ… MicroPython:
β€’ Easily control Wi-Fi, sockets, HTTP servers/clients with a few lines.
β€’ Example:
β€’ import network
β€’ wlan = network.WLAN(network.STA_IF)
β€’ wlan.active(True)
β€’ wlan.connect(‘SSID’, ‘password’)
❌ Arduino:
β€’ Requires external libraries (WiFi.h, HTTPClient.h), more code, more debugging.
β€’ Less intuitive for high-level networking tasks.
________________________________________
πŸ“ 5. Filesystem Support
βœ… MicroPython:
β€’ Built-in filesystem (LittleFS or SPIFFS).
β€’ You can upload Python scripts, HTML pages (for web servers), config files, logs, etc.
β€’ Easily managed through Thonny’s file browser.
❌ Arduino:
β€’ Requires setting up filesystem manually.
β€’ File editing is less convenient.
________________________________________
πŸ” 6. Interactive Debugging with REPL
βœ… MicroPython:
β€’ Connect to the board’s REPL via Thonny (or PuTTY).
β€’ Run code live, inspect variables, try out functions.
❌ Arduino:
β€’ Debugging is mostly via Serial.print().
β€’ No live code execution or introspection.
________________________________________

πŸ“Š Comparison Table

FeatureMicroPython + ThonnyArduino IDE (C++)
LanguagePython (beginner-friendly)C++ (lower-level)
IDEThonny (simple + REPL)Arduino IDE / PlatformIO
File System SupportYes (via Thonny UI)Limited, needs setup
Wi-Fi and NetworkingSimple, built-inRequires more setup/code
Compile/Upload TimeInstant run (no compile)Compiling + flashing required
DebuggingInteractive REPLSerial.print() debugging
Suitable for Beginnersβœ… Excellent❌ Steeper learning curve
Community SupportStrongVery strong
PerformanceSlower (Python interpreted)Faster (compiled C++)

________________________________________
πŸ”š Conclusion
If you’re:
β€’ Learning to program microcontrollers,
β€’ Rapidly prototyping IoT devices,
β€’ Familiar with Python,
β€’ Teaching students or working on quick experiments,
MicroPython with Thonny is the better choice.
If you’re:
β€’ Building performance-critical or production-grade firmware,
β€’ Needing fine control over memory/timing,
β€’ Comfortable with C/C++,
Then Arduino IDE or ESP-IDF might be more appropriate.

MidroPython Arduino handshaking

In my opinion, bias in comparing two products causes problems in the decision output and comparison result. In this context, I must say that despite the comparisons made in this article, it should be noted that different products always focus on a part of the work in a more specialized way, so the selection of the most appropriate solution for use in developing products with ESP boards is made based on the needs of the manufacturer and the product.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top